From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261362AbVGTE7U (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:59:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261626AbVGTE7U (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:59:20 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:18650 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261362AbVGTE7T (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:59:19 -0400 Subject: Re: Interbench real time benchmark results From: Lee Revell To: Con Kolivas Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org In-Reply-To: <200507200816.11386.kernel@kolivas.org> References: <200507200816.11386.kernel@kolivas.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:59:17 -0400 Message-Id: <1121835557.23806.0.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 08:16 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > As a data point I went back to a 2.6.10 kernel which predates some > latency fixes that went into mainline. > I think most of the important ones had already gone in by then. It would be more interesting to compare it with 2.6.8. Lee