public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Alejandro Bonilla <abonilla@linuxwireless.org>
Cc: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain kernel version
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:09:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1122088160.6510.7.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42E1986B.8070202@linuxwireless.org>

On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:07 -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> I will get flames for this, but my laptop boots faster and sometimes 
> responds faster in 2.4.27 than in 2.6.12. Sorry, but this is the fact 
> for me. IBM T42.

Sorry dude, but there's just no way that any automated process can catch
these.

You will have to provide a detailed bug report (with numbers) like
everyone else so we can fix it.  "Waiting for it to fix itself" is the
WORST thing you can do.

If you find a regression vs. an earlier kernel, please assume that
you're the ONLY one to notice it and respond accordingly.

Lee


  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-23  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-23  0:44 Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain kernel version Blaisorblade
2005-07-23  0:50 ` David Lang
2005-07-23  0:59   ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-07-23  1:07 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23  3:09   ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-07-23  2:15     ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23  3:21       ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23  2:34         ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23  3:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-23  2:40           ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23  3:34           ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23  9:05             ` Con Kolivas
2005-07-23 16:45               ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23  5:34         ` Giving developers clue how many testers verifiedcertain " Al Boldi
2005-07-23  3:56       ` Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain " Adrian Bunk
2005-07-23  9:21 ` Jesper Krogh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-22  1:34 Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-22  2:10 ` Mark Nipper
2005-07-22  2:38   ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-22  2:40     ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-22 23:22       ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-22 23:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-24 18:45   ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-24 18:54     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-24 19:10       ` Martin MOKREJŠ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1122088160.6510.7.camel@mindpipe \
    --to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=abonilla@linuxwireless.org \
    --cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox