From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261266AbVG0EUj (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:20:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261448AbVG0EUg (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:20:36 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:45733 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261266AbVG0EUe (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:20:34 -0400 Subject: RE: kernel optimization From: Lee Revell To: Al Boldi Cc: "'Adrian Bunk'" , "'Linux kernel'" , "'Horst von Brand'" In-Reply-To: <200507270354.GAA27975@raad.intranet> References: <200507270354.GAA27975@raad.intranet> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:20:31 -0400 Message-Id: <1122438032.13598.16.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 06:53 +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > Gettimeofday loops using gcc-3.2.2 on 2.4.31 and 2.6.12. > > Also, 2.4 is faster than 2.6! All this proves is that gettimeofday() is faster on 2.4 than 2.6. Hardly surprising. Lee