From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261475AbVG1BUt (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:20:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261476AbVG1BUt (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:20:49 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:16613 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261475AbVG1BUr (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:20:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable From: Lee Revell To: Daniel Walker Cc: Steven Rostedt , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <1122512420.5014.6.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> References: <1122473595.29823.60.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1122512420.5014.6.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:20:45 -0400 Message-Id: <1122513645.22844.15.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 18:00 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > Don't you break sched_find_first_bit() , seems it's dependent on a > 140-bit bitmap . And doesn't POSIX specify 100 RT priority levels? Lee