public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] speed up on find_first_bit for i386 (let compiler do the work)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1122554706.29823.228.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1122551014.29823.205.camel@localhost.localdomain>

[snip]
>  static inline int find_first_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned size)
>  {
[snip]
> +	int x = 0;
> +	do {
> +		if (*addr)
> +			return __ffs(*addr) + x;
> +		addr++;
> +		if (x >= size)
> +			break;
> +		x += 32;
The 32 looks like it may be problamatic.  Is there any i386 64 bit
machines.  Or is hard coding 32 OK?

> +	} while (1);
> +	return x;
>  }
>  

Just in case, I've updated the patch to use (sizeof(*addr)<<3)

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Index: vanilla_kernel/include/asm-i386/bitops.h
===================================================================
--- vanilla_kernel/include/asm-i386/bitops.h	(revision 263)
+++ vanilla_kernel/include/asm-i386/bitops.h	(working copy)
@@ -311,6 +311,20 @@
 int find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr, int size, int offset);
 
 /**
+ * __ffs - find first bit in word.
+ * @word: The word to search
+ *
+ * Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word)
+{
+	__asm__("bsfl %1,%0"
+		:"=r" (word)
+		:"rm" (word));
+	return word;
+}
+
+/**
  * find_first_bit - find the first set bit in a memory region
  * @addr: The address to start the search at
  * @size: The maximum size to search
@@ -320,22 +334,16 @@
  */
 static inline int find_first_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned size)
 {
-	int d0, d1;
-	int res;
-
-	/* This looks at memory. Mark it volatile to tell gcc not to move it around */
-	__asm__ __volatile__(
-		"xorl %%eax,%%eax\n\t"
-		"repe; scasl\n\t"
-		"jz 1f\n\t"
-		"leal -4(%%edi),%%edi\n\t"
-		"bsfl (%%edi),%%eax\n"
-		"1:\tsubl %%ebx,%%edi\n\t"
-		"shll $3,%%edi\n\t"
-		"addl %%edi,%%eax"
-		:"=a" (res), "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1)
-		:"1" ((size + 31) >> 5), "2" (addr), "b" (addr) : "memory");
-	return res;
+	int x = 0;
+	do {
+		if (*addr)
+			return __ffs(*addr) + x;
+		addr++;
+		if (x >= size)
+			break;
+		x += (sizeof(*addr)<<3);
+	} while (1);
+	return x;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -360,20 +368,6 @@
 	return word;
 }
 
-/**
- * __ffs - find first bit in word.
- * @word: The word to search
- *
- * Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first.
- */
-static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word)
-{
-	__asm__("bsfl %1,%0"
-		:"=r" (word)
-		:"rm" (word));
-	return word;
-}
-
 /*
  * fls: find last bit set.
  */



  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-28 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-27 14:13 [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable Steven Rostedt
2005-07-27 14:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-27 14:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-27 14:33     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-27 14:47       ` [PATCH] safty check of MAX_RT_PRIO >= MAX_USER_RT_PRIO Steven Rostedt
2005-07-27 15:05         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-27 18:52         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-27 14:53       ` [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable Esben Nielsen
2005-07-27 15:02         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-27 16:09         ` K.R. Foley
2005-07-27 17:01           ` Esben Nielsen
2005-07-27 17:25             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-27 21:32               ` Esben Nielsen
2005-07-28 12:17                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28  7:22               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-28 11:53                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-27 17:42             ` K.R. Foley
2005-07-28  9:59               ` Esben Nielsen
2005-07-27 14:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-27 14:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-27 14:46       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28  7:33         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-28  1:42   ` Matt Mackall
2005-07-28  1:00 ` Daniel Walker
2005-07-28  1:20   ` Lee Revell
2005-07-28  1:26     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28  1:25   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28  3:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28  3:32       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28  3:45         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28  3:51           ` Nick Piggin
2005-07-28 11:43             ` [PATCH] speed up on find_first_bit for i386 (let compiler do the work) Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28 12:45               ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-07-28 15:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-28 15:30               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-28 15:47                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28 16:34                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-28 16:57                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28 17:25                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-29 10:03                         ` David Woodhouse
2005-07-29 14:41                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-29 16:23                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-29 14:39                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-29 16:29                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-29 17:14                             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-28 17:17                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-29 15:09                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-28 18:25                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-28 18:56                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-28 17:52               ` Mitchell Blank Jr
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-29 14:37 linux
2005-07-29 15:08 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-07-31 16:33 Richard Kennedy
2005-08-01  2:00 linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1122554706.29823.228.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox