From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762438AbYBTSNa (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:13:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751511AbYBTSNU (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:13:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:41281 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750894AbYBTSNT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:13:19 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20080220175145.GA6733@cvg> References: <20080220175145.GA6733@cvg> <20080218200302.GA6741@cvg> <19148.1203512465@redhat.com> <20080220131442.GA18790@uranus.ravnborg.org> To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Sam Ravnborg , LKML Subject: Re: [QUESTION] FRV: linking error? X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3+cvs; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 23.0.50 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:13:15 +0000 Message-ID: <11226.1203531195@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Sam, maybe we should just eliminate this section at least for FRV? You should have a patch in your inbox to do just that. David