From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262653AbVG2Qzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:55:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262666AbVG2Qzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:55:42 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:27796 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262653AbVG2Qzk (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:55:40 -0400 Message-Id: <1122656138.19704@shark.he.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:55:38 -0700 From: "Randy Dunlap" To: Jesper Juhl , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc4 X-Mailer: WebMail 1.25 X-IPAddress: 134.134.136.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On 7/29/05, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Hey everybody, > > > > as many of you are aware, we were talking (not enough) about the release > > process at LKS this year. > > > > This ain't it. > > > > This is just the regular old release "process", with some LKS backlog put > > in for good measure. > > > > But the good news is, that I'll try the new release process after 2.6.13 > > is out, which is hopefully not too far away. Which means that we should > > try to let people know about the fact that if they want to merge stuff, > > they should do so in the first two weeks after the 2.6.13 release, and no > > later (also, no earlier either, by now). > > > > For the bennefit of those of us who were not at LKS, could someone > elaborate a bit on "the new release process" ? It's summarized here: http://lwn.net/Articles/144281/ --- ~Randy