From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262064AbVGaXJ5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:09:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262038AbVGaXJ5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:09:57 -0400 Received: from b3162.static.pacific.net.au ([203.143.238.98]:54410 "EHLO cunningham.myip.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262083AbVGaXIW (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:08:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2 From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: ncunningham@cyclades.com To: "David S. Miller" Cc: bunk@stusta.de, Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050731.153631.70217457.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20050731222606.GL3608@stusta.de> <20050731.153631.70217457.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Cycades Message-Id: <1122851299.4351.278.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:08:19 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 08:36, David S. Miller wrote: > Many people still use 2.95 because it's still the fastest > way to get a kernel build done and that's important for > many people. Yes, please don't remove 2.95 support. Regards, Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities.