From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:49:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1122925799.6759.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1122920564.6759.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Ingo,
Here's a conversion of the bit_spin_locks to wait_on_bit.
Unfortunately, this doesn't have PI but it is better than just a normal
bit_spin_lock.
This patch applies cleanly to 2.6.13-rc3 (that's what I tried it on). I
haven't done any benchmarking and I only booted this on a RT UP machine
so far. The RT part uses this portion.
So Stephen, please take a look and let me know if this is something
that is suitable for the mainline?
Thanks,
-- Steve
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Index: linux_realtime_ernie/include/linux/jbd.h
===================================================================
--- linux_realtime_ernie/include/linux/jbd.h (revision 266)
+++ linux_realtime_ernie/include/linux/jbd.h (working copy)
@@ -324,36 +324,88 @@
return bh->b_private;
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+
+extern int jbd_lock_bh_sleep(void *notused);
+
static inline void jbd_lock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- bit_spin_lock(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ wait_on_bit_lock(&bh->b_state,BH_State,&jbd_lock_bh_sleep,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ __acquire(bitlock);
}
static inline int jbd_trylock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- return bit_spin_trylock(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ if (test_and_set_bit(BH_State, &bh->b_state))
+ return 0;
+ __acquire(bitlock);
+ return 1;
}
static inline int jbd_is_locked_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- return bit_spin_is_locked(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ return test_bit(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
}
static inline void jbd_unlock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- bit_spin_unlock(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ clear_bit(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
+ wake_up_bit(&bh->b_state, BH_State);
+ __release(bitlock);
}
static inline void jbd_lock_bh_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- bit_spin_lock(BH_JournalHead, &bh->b_state);
+ wait_on_bit_lock(&bh->b_state, BH_JournalHead, &jbd_lock_bh_sleep,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ __acquire(bitlock);
}
static inline void jbd_unlock_bh_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- bit_spin_unlock(BH_JournalHead, &bh->b_state);
+ clear_bit(BH_JournalHead, &bh->b_state);
+ smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
+ wake_up_bit(&bh->b_state, BH_JournalHead);
+ __release(bitlock);
}
+#else /* ! (CONFIG_SMP || CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK || CONFIG_PREEMPT) */
+
+static inline void jbd_lock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ __acquire(journal_bh_state_lock);
+}
+
+static inline int jbd_trylock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ __acquire(journal_bh_state_lock);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static inline int jbd_is_locked_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static inline void jbd_unlock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ __release(journal_bh_state_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void jbd_lock_bh_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ __acquire(journal_bh_journal_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void jbd_unlock_bh_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ __release(journal_bh_journal_lock);
+}
+#endif /* (CONFIG_SMP || CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK || CONFIG_PREEMPT) */
+
+
struct jbd_revoke_table_s;
/**
Index: linux_realtime_ernie/fs/jbd/journal.c
===================================================================
--- linux_realtime_ernie/fs/jbd/journal.c (revision 266)
+++ linux_realtime_ernie/fs/jbd/journal.c (working copy)
@@ -80,6 +80,14 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(journal_try_to_free_buffers);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(journal_force_commit);
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+int jbd_lock_bh_sleep(void *notused)
+{
+ schedule();
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
static int journal_convert_superblock_v1(journal_t *, journal_superblock_t *);
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-01 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-30 16:03 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01 Ingo Molnar
2005-07-30 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2005-07-30 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-31 4:47 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 4:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 21:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 21:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-02 13:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 14:05 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 15:37 ` 2.6.13-rc3 -> sluggish PS2 keyboard (was Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01) Lee Revell
2005-08-02 15:44 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-08-02 15:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 15:47 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 15:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 15:55 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-08-02 15:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-08-02 15:38 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01 Lee Revell
2005-07-31 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2005-07-31 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-31 15:56 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-05 Gene Heskett
2005-08-01 18:22 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01 Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 19:49 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-08-01 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 21:09 ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-01 21:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-02 0:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 21:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 21:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 21:20 ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-02 0:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-02 19:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 19:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 23:38 ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-03 0:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 1:12 ` George Anzinger
2005-08-03 1:48 ` Keith Owens
2005-08-03 2:12 ` George Anzinger
2005-08-03 2:25 ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-03 2:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 2:58 ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-03 10:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 15:10 ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-03 10:37 ` [Question] arch-independent way to differentiate between user and kernel Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-03 12:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 10:56 ` [Question] arch-independent way to differentiate between user andkernel linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-03 11:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 12:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-03 12:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 14:50 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01 Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 15:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 16:44 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <20050812125844.GA13357@elte.hu>
2005-08-26 4:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-26 6:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-26 11:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-30 10:58 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-08-30 11:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-30 11:00 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-08-02 3:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 4:07 ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-02 14:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-04 12:20 ` Andrzej Nowak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1122925799.6759.38.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox