From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com,
tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com, ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 02:24:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1122963870.5490.17.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508021556.50450.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:56 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 03:52 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:49 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > As a crude data point of idle system running a full kde desktop
> > > environment on
> > > powersave with minimal backlight and just chatting on IRC I find it's
> > > just
> > > under 10% battery life difference.
> >
> > Have you tried the same test but without artsd, or with it configured to
> > release the sound device after some reasonable time, like 1-2s?
>
> I have it on release after 1 second already.
Is there any difference in power use between this, and not running artsd
at all?
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-02 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-02 4:43 [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered) Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 5:35 ` [ck] " Michael Marineau
2005-08-02 5:49 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 5:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 5:56 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 6:24 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-08-02 7:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 7:39 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 8:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 10:54 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 11:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 12:04 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 7:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 14:01 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-08-02 14:05 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-06 14:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-08-06 15:00 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-08 5:43 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-08-08 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-08 18:37 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-08-10 6:44 ` Thomas Renninger
2005-08-10 6:57 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1122963870.5490.17.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox