From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Marc Ballarin <Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Calling suspend() in halt/restart/shutdown -> not a good idea
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:40:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123069255.30257.27.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050802095401.GB1442@elf.ucw.cz>
> I'd like to get rid of shutdown callback. Having two copies of code
> (one in callback, one in suspend) is ugly.
Well, it's obviously not a good time for this. First, suspend and
shutdown don't necessarily do the same thing, then it just doesn't work
in practice. So either do it right completely or not at all, but 2.6.13
isn't the place for an half-assed hack that looks like a solution to
you.
I do agree that there are enough similarities between the suspend and
shutdown process that we could use the same callback, but then, please,
at least with a different argument and with drivers beeing fixed to
handle it. Most drivers should probably just "ignore" shutdown anyway.
BTW. I suppose we still have the same constant for PMSG_FREEZE and
PMSG_SUSPEND ? That could have been fixed ages ago and is more important
imho....
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-03 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-01 15:09 Calling suspend() in halt/restart/shutdown -> not a good idea Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-01 18:37 ` Marc Ballarin
2005-08-01 20:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-02 9:54 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-03 11:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-08-03 16:53 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-08-03 19:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-04 20:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-04 21:04 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-02 9:53 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-02 14:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-08-02 14:45 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-03 11:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-03 11:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-03 11:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-04 2:27 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-02 10:04 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-03 11:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1123069255.30257.27.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox