From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Stephen Ray <stephen@mrmighty.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>,
David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>,
Marc Ballarin <Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:12:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123096370.9038.9.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F0FB55.9000409@mrmighty.net>
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 14:13 -0300, Stephen Ray wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 13:25 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> >>BTW I think many architectures have HZ=100 even in 2.6, so it is not
> >>as siple as "go 2.6"...
> >
> >
> > Does not matter. An app that only ever worked on 2.6 + x86 will break
> > on 2.6.13.
> >
> > Lee
> >
>
> But then isn't that app broken? What if the user running it selects
> something other than HZ=1000?
Then they changed the setting from the defaults, so they get what they
deserve. If kernel defaults are irrelevant, the only issue is whether
or not we choose to violate the principle of least surprise for people
who run kernel.org kernels. The technical merits of different HZ
settings are completely irrelevant.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-03 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-29 22:49 Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers Marc Ballarin
2005-07-29 23:15 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 10:06 ` Marc Ballarin
2005-07-30 18:05 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 18:18 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-07-30 18:14 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 18:35 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 20:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 19:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-30 20:04 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 20:21 ` James Bruce
2005-07-31 21:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 21:41 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 21:57 ` James Bruce
2005-07-31 22:32 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:20 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-08-01 1:59 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-08-02 9:08 ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-07-31 21:54 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 22:02 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 22:18 ` James Bruce
2005-07-31 22:07 ` Jim Crilly
2005-07-31 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 22:39 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 3:49 ` Jim Crilly
2005-08-01 7:26 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-01 18:16 ` Jim Crilly
2005-08-10 18:49 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-31 22:12 ` James Bruce
2005-07-31 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:23 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 23:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:53 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 7:28 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-10 19:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-01 6:19 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-08-01 16:07 ` Jan Knutar
2005-08-01 18:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 9:13 ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-08-02 14:58 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 7:44 ` David Weinehall
2005-08-01 16:18 ` James Bruce
2005-08-01 19:27 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 20:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-08-02 4:50 ` James Bruce
2005-08-02 13:10 ` Stephen Clark
2005-08-02 14:02 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 14:12 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-02 17:06 ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-08-02 17:45 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-02 17:55 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 14:15 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 14:20 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-08-02 14:22 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 15:18 ` Joel Jaeggli
2005-08-03 8:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-08-02 14:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-02 14:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 19:26 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-08-02 15:42 ` James Bruce
2005-08-02 15:58 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 17:02 ` Prakash Punnoor
2005-08-02 16:08 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-08-05 6:39 ` James Bruce
2005-08-11 19:22 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-08-03 9:19 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-08-03 13:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-08-04 12:52 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-08-02 6:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 11:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-02 14:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 14:31 ` Roman Zippel
2005-08-02 11:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-02 14:07 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-03 17:13 ` Stephen Ray
2005-08-03 19:12 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-07-30 20:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 10:06 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-10 19:08 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-03 15:20 ambx1
2005-08-03 16:47 ` James Bruce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1123096370.9038.9.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de \
--cc=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=stephen@mrmighty.net \
--cc=tao@acc.umu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox