From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261538AbVHDAMU (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:12:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261656AbVHDAMU (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:12:20 -0400 Received: from smtp1.brturbo.com.br ([200.199.201.163]:62929 "EHLO smtp1.brturbo.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261538AbVHDAMT (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:12:19 -0400 Subject: Re: BTTV - experimental no_overlay patch From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: 7eggert@gmx.de Cc: Andrew Burgess , LKML , Linux and Kernel Video In-Reply-To: References: <4xiqy-2F3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 21:06:40 -0300 Message-Id: <1123114000.8274.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-5mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bodo, Please, send me bttv init logs. I need to know if PCI quirks has detected your PCI chipset as a problematic one. Em Qui, 2005-08-04 ās 01:02 +0200, Bodo Eggert escreveu: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > This small patch will allow no_overlay flag to disable BTTV driver to > > report OVERLAY capabilities. It should fix your troubles by enabling > > no_overlay=1 when inserting bttv module. > > > > This patch is against our CVS tree, but should apply with some hunk on > > 2.6.13-rc4 or 2.6.13-rc5. > > > > I'll generate a new one at morning, against 2.6.13-rc5 hopefully to > > have it applied at 2.6.13, since it fixes an OOPS. > > The CVS line will off cause not apply, and I needed to change > s/static// int no_overlay in bttv-cards.c. Strange. At CVS it worked even with static. But it should be ok. > > The picture is less distorted by pci activity with no_overlay=1, and it > feels like the stable interface I used with my nvidia+2.4+XF86 before > upgrading to 2.6+radeon+X.org. No OOPS within the first few minutes:). That's good! Mauro.