From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
To: discuss@x86-64.org, linux <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Major breakage in linux-git on x86_64, oom killer goes on rampage
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:58:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123185522.2462.14.camel@dv.roinet.com> (raw)
Hello!
This fix breaks x64_64:
commit f33ea7f404e592e4563b12101b7a4d17da6558d7
tree 1d587ad8a06cb6d2e3a187f0312c8a524ffefe53
parent 5cb4cc0d8211c490537c8568001958fc76741312
author Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Wed, 03 Aug 2005 20:24:01
+1000
committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> Wed, 03 Aug 2005
09:12:05 -0700
* include/linux/mm.h, mm/memory.c:
[PATCH] fix get_user_pages bug
...
The system doesn't boot. Most processes are killed by VM.
The patch does more than it claims. It actually redefines VM_FAULT_OOM
and VM_FAULT_SIGBUS. Unfortunately, a quick look at
arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c shows that the return value of handle_mm_fault()
is compared with numerical constants. This patch helps partly:
--- arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c
+++ arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c
@@ -439,15 +439,15 @@ good_area:
* the fault.
*/
switch (handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, address, write)) {
- case 1:
+ case VM_FAULT_MINOR:
tsk->min_flt++;
break;
- case 2:
+ case VM_FAULT_MAJOR:
tsk->maj_flt++;
break;
- case 0:
+ case VM_FAULT_SIGBUS:
goto do_sigbus;
- default:
+ case VM_FAULT_OOM:
goto out_of_memory;
}
Now the system boot goes a little further and then the kernel reports a
BUG in mm/memory.c:985. Apparently __handle_mm_fault() returns
something unexpected. My guess is that some x86_64 specific functions
return -1 and 0 when they mean VM_FAULT_SIGBUS and VM_FAULT_OOM.
Returning -1 would trigger BUG(), returning 0 would be treated as
VM_FAULT_OOM rather than VM_FAULT_SIGBUS.
I'm not sure I'll be able to fix it quickly, but I hope the gurus will
beat me at that. In the meantime, please don't make any releases unless
the "commit f33ea7f404e592e4563b12101b7a4d17da6558d7" is reverted.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-04 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-04 19:58 Pavel Roskin [this message]
2005-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] Re: Major breakage in linux-git on x86_64, oom killer goes on rampage Pavel Roskin
2005-08-04 21:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Pavel Roskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1123185522.2462.14.camel@dv.roinet.com \
--to=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox