public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	John B?ckstrand <sandos@home.se>
Subject: Re: lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 10:27:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123252026.18332.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050805141426.GU8266@wotan.suse.de>

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 16:14 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:10:13AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 15:55 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > This is fixing the symptom and is not the cure.  Unfortunately I don't
> > > > have a e1000 card so I can't try a fix. But I did have a e100 card that
> > > > would lock up the same way.  The problem was that netpoll_poll calls the
> > > > cards netpoll routine (in e1000_main.c e1000_netpoll).  In the e100
> > > > case, when the transmit buffer would fill up, the queue would go down.
> > > > But the netpoll routine in the e100 code never put it back up after it
> > > > was all transfered. So this would lock up the kernel when that happened.
> > > 
> > > In my case the hang happened when no cable was connected.
> > 
> > But should come back when the cable is reconnected. 
> 
> Which might be never. Not an option.

Hey! You removed my admission to this. Don't make me look stupid
here ;-)

> 
> > Hmm, how bad is it to have a printk in a routine that is registered to
> > printk?   If this does print, a "static once" variable should be added
> > so that this is only printed once and not everytime it tries to print
> > this message.
> 
> printk notices it is recursing and will not try to output it.

Darn it, since this should really be reported.  Yes, the core netpoll
should bail out, but it is also a problem with the driver and should be
fixed.

Come to think of it, I should have submitted a patch that did what you
did when I discovered the problem with the e100. But that network card
was slow and could easily lock up when doing a sysrq-t.  I wasn't
removing cables, so I just submitted the fix for the e100, not thinking
that the netpoll shouldn't lock up itself.

-- Steve



  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-05 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <42F347D2.7000207@home.se.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-08-05 11:45 ` lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 12:44   ` John Bäckstrand
2005-08-05 13:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 13:55     ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 14:10       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 14:14         ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 14:27           ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-08-05 14:36             ` David S. Miller
2005-08-05 15:02               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 14:36           ` [PATCH] netpoll can lock up on low memory Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 20:01             ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 20:57               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 21:28                 ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  0:23                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  1:53                     ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  2:32                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  7:30                         ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-06  7:58                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-06 23:10                           ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  9:46                         ` David S. Miller
2005-08-06  9:57                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06 12:09                             ` John Bäckstrand
2005-08-07  5:40                             ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 21:26               ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 21:42                 ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 21:51                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-06  1:16                     ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  0:30                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  7:45                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-06 11:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-07 21:12     ` lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion John Bäckstrand
2005-08-08  2:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 20:12   ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 21:56     ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 23:20       ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 23:51         ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-06  1:22           ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  1:37             ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-05 11:04 John Bäckstrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1123252026.18332.37.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandos@home.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox