From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262903AbVHEUFy (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:05:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263115AbVHEUFx (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:05:53 -0400 Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.36.81]:23698 "HELO smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263108AbVHEUFR (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:05:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] fsnotify: hook on removexattr, too From: John McCutchan To: Robert Love Cc: marijn ros , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1123271715.30486.82.camel@betsy> References: <20050805180739.A49DF1F50B1@ws1-2.us4.outblaze.com> <1123271715.30486.82.camel@betsy> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 16:05:16 -0400 Message-Id: <1123272316.28473.0.camel@vertex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 15:55 -0400, Robert Love wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 19:07 +0100, marijn ros wrote: > > > I got wondering, why does fs_notify_xattr get called from setxattr in fs/xattr.c, but > > not from removexattr that is below it in the same file? Both seem to make changes to > > xattrs and both are exported as system calls. > > We should. > Yes we should. Signed-off-by: John McCtuchan -- John McCutchan