From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261883AbVHEUsq (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:48:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261988AbVHEUsq (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:48:46 -0400 Received: from fmr19.intel.com ([134.134.136.18]:48336 "EHLO orsfmr004.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263152AbVHEUsB (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:48:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] use bus_slot number for name From: Kristen Accardi To: Dave Jones Cc: pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, rajesh.shah@intel.com In-Reply-To: <20050805195123.GN2241@redhat.com> References: <1123269366.8917.39.camel@whizzy> <20050805195123.GN2241@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:47:36 -0700 Message-Id: <1123274856.8917.54.camel@whizzy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2005 20:47:37.0041 (UTC) FILETIME=[E9A27C10:01C599FE] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 15:51 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:16:06PM -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote: > > For systems with multiple hotplug controllers, you need to use more than > > just the slot number to uniquely name the slot. Without a unique slot > > name, the pci_hp_register() will fail. This patch adds the bus number > > to the name. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi > > > > diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.13-rc4/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.13-rc4/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h linux-2.6.13-rc4-shpchp-slot-name-fix/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h > > --- linux-2.6.13-rc4/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h 2005-07-28 15:44:44.000000000 -0700 > > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-shpchp-slot-name-fix/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h 2005-08-04 17:57:18.000000000 -0700 > > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static inline void return_resource(struc > > > > static inline void make_slot_name(char *buffer, int buffer_size, struct slot *slot) > > { > > - snprintf(buffer, buffer_size, "%d", slot->number); > > + snprintf(buffer, buffer_size, "%04d_%04d", slot->bus, slot->number); > > } > > Won't using.. > > snprintf(buffer, buffer_size, "%s", pci_name(slot)); > > work equally as well, and also future-proof this ? > > Dave Well, it isn't as convenient since pci_dev is not available from the slot structure. But I will do it if this is the general consensus.