From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Wilkens <robw@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:53:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123883633.5296.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a87484905081212317ca8c04e@mail.gmail.com>
Two more systems that are different from Linux.
So far, Linux is the odd ball out.
-- Steve
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 22:28 +0100, someone else wrote:
>
> SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
>
> sa_mask blocks other signals
> SA_NODEFER does not block other signals
> SA_NODEFER does not affect sa_mask
> SA_NODEFER and sa_mask blocks sig
> !SA_NODEFER blocks sig
> SA_NODEFER does not block sig
> sa_mask blocks sig
>
>
> OSF1 hostname V5.1 2650 alpha
>
> sa_mask blocks other signals
> SA_NODEFER does not block other signals
> SA_NODEFER does not affect sa_mask
> SA_NODEFER and sa_mask blocks sig
> !SA_NODEFER blocks sig
> SA_NODEFER does not block sig
> sa_mask blocks sig
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-12 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-09 17:44 Signal handling possibly wrong Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 18:26 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 18:32 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 18:39 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 18:44 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 19:04 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 19:41 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 20:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 20:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 20:49 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 21:00 ` [PATCH] Fix i386 signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask (was: Re: Signal handling possibly wrong) Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 21:06 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 21:07 ` [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 21:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-10 3:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-10 3:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 18:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-08-12 18:45 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-12 18:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 19:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 19:31 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-12 21:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-14 11:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-12 21:53 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-08-14 22:04 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-08-13 18:47 ` Marc Ballarin
2005-08-10 9:44 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 21:04 ` Signal handling possibly wrong Chris Wright
2005-08-10 9:11 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-10 16:20 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 19:33 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2005-08-09 18:50 ` smbus driver for ati xpress 200m yhlu
2005-08-09 22:57 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-10 2:51 ` yhlu
2005-08-10 7:27 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1123883633.5296.26.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robw@optonline.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox