From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750711AbVHOEHO (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:07:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750712AbVHOEHO (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:07:14 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:51652 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750711AbVHOEHN (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:07:13 -0400 Subject: Re: Preemptive patch for 2.4.25 From: Lee Revell To: Dmytro Bablinyuk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:07:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1124078828.4918.9.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 13:25 +1000, Dmytro Bablinyuk wrote: > I hope this is the right place to ask. My apologise if it's wrong. > I have found 2.4.25-low-latency.patch.gz for the 2.4.25 kernel but I > couldn't find preemptible patch for this version of kernel. > I found preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.23-pre5-1.patch and > preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.26-pre5-1.patch which are pretty close but not > exactly for the same version. Why would you run 2.4 if you need low latency? Any recent 2.6 kernel will blow that out of the water. Lee