From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751320AbVHQXRD (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:17:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751321AbVHQXRD (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:17:03 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:4019 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751320AbVHQXRC (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:17:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] API for timer hooks From: Lee Revell To: Stas Sergeev Cc: john stultz , Linux kernel In-Reply-To: <430376B8.9040404@aknet.ru> References: <42FDF744.2070205@aknet.ru> <1124126354.8630.3.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <43024ADA.8030508@aknet.ru> <1124244580.30036.5.camel@mindpipe> <430363F2.7090009@aknet.ru> <1124296844.3591.7.camel@mindpipe> <430376B8.9040404@aknet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:16:59 -0400 Message-Id: <1124320620.3591.14.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 21:41 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote: > I guess now I realized how you (and Nish) > assume I could use it: is it that I > should set CONFIG_HZ to the value I > need at compile-time, and just remove > all the timer reprogramming from the > driver in a hope the dynamic-tick patch > will slow it down itself when necessary? The current implementations don't allow HZ to go higher than CONFIG_HZ but that's the next logical step. Lee