From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932335AbVHRRiW@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932335AbVHRRiW (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932337AbVHRRiW
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:22 -0400
Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:60577 "HELO
	mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S932335AbVHRRiV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:21 -0400
Subject: Re: openafs is really faster on linux-2.4. than 2.6
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Martin =?iso-8859-2?Q?MOKREJ=A9?= 
	<mmokrejs@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <430483A2.9010605@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
References: <43032109.6030709@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
	 <4303293D.10805@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
	 <430339AF.7080102@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
	 <4303B70B.9080707@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
	 <4304686F.20602@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
	 <430483A2.9010605@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:18 -0400
Message-Id: <1124386699.5973.22.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.7 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 14:48 +0200, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
> I think the problem here is outside afs.

Does not matter.  If you want people to give a shit about openafs then
GET IT MERGED.  Why is that so hard to understand?

Lee