From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:28:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124422128.25424.7.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e050818200936bad1d3@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
> here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
horribly.
I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-19 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-15 4:46 [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6 Peter Williams
2005-08-15 12:29 ` Michal Piotrowski
[not found] ` <43012427.9080406@bigpond.net.au>
[not found] ` <4301330B.3070400@bigpond.net.au>
2005-08-16 12:54 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 8:00 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 11:23 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 12:31 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-16 21:49 ` Schedulers benchmark - Was: " Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 8:10 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 9:03 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 18:04 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 21:35 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 23:15 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 23:16 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 23:48 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 23:45 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 3:09 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-19 3:28 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-08-19 3:41 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 4:41 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-19 4:36 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 20:13 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 0:31 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-20 3:04 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 18:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-19 4:26 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 11:59 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 1:34 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 1:47 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 4:16 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 4:22 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 4:44 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 4:49 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 1:37 ` Michal Piotrowski
[not found] ` <4309125B.4020707@bigpond.net.au>
2005-08-22 11:39 ` Michal Piotrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1124422128.25424.7.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox