From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751070AbVHSD2v (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:28:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751071AbVHSD2v (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:28:51 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:1232 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750977AbVHSD2v (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:28:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6 From: Lee Revell To: Michal Piotrowski Cc: Con Kolivas , Peter Williams , LKML In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e050818200936bad1d3@mail.gmail.com> References: <43001E18.8020707@bigpond.net.au> <200508180916.08454.kernel@kolivas.org> <4303CCB9.6000403@bigpond.net.au> <200508180945.50185.kernel@kolivas.org> <6bffcb0e050818200936bad1d3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:28:47 -0400 Message-Id: <1124422128.25424.7.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > here are interbench v0.29 resoults: The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting. Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs horribly. I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the 2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference. Lee