public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zubaj <pzubaj@gaya.sk>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Emmanuel Fleury <fleury@cs.aau.dk>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:41:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124829672.3351.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124747695.16064.46.camel@mindpipe>

This is too expensive card to be only able use it as simple card.
My advice buy something else.
I don't think fight with creative can bring anything good to linux.
Leave Creative as is. There is plenty of other hardware from other
manufacturer worth money.

Peter Zubaj

On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 17:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 21:38 +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> > We are not going to get any support from Creative for the X-Fi chip.
> > We do not get support from Creative for any Creative chip that has a
> > DSP in it. 
> 
> Well, except for the emu10k1 driver that Creative wrote and released
> years ago.  I don't see why they can't do something similar with the
> X-Fi stuff.  We don't need or expect the DSP programming docs, just the
> minimum to get sound in and out of the thing.
> 
> So do you expect Creative to leave thousands of emu10k1/emu10k2 Linux
> users with no upgrade path?  I think if they tried to do this we could
> make it a real PR nightmare for them.
> 
> Lee



  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-23 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-19  9:55 [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip Emmanuel Fleury
2005-08-19 22:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20  5:17   ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20  6:48   ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-08-20  7:08     ` Lee Revell
2005-08-22 12:18       ` [Alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2005-08-22 20:38         ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-08-22 21:54           ` Lee Revell
2005-08-23 20:41             ` Peter Zubaj [this message]
2005-08-23 18:48               ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-08-23 22:12                 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-23 21:39               ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1124829672.3351.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=pzubaj@gaya.sk \
    --cc=James@superbug.co.uk \
    --cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=fleury@cs.aau.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox