From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751371AbVH2W1o@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751371AbVH2W1o (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:27:44 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751372AbVH2W1V
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:27:21 -0400
Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:29622 "HELO
	viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1751367AbVH2W00 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:26:26 -0400
Subject: Dynamic tick for 2.6.14 - what's the plan?
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:26:24 -0400
Message-Id: <1125354385.4598.79.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.8 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

The controversy over the introduction of CONFIG_HZ demonstrated the
urgency of getting a dynamic tick solution merged before 2.6.14.

Anyone care to give a status report?  Con, do you feel that the last
version you posted is ready to go in?

Lee