From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751099AbVH3B7J (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:59:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751112AbVH3B7J (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:59:09 -0400 Received: from smtp2.Stanford.EDU ([171.67.16.125]:32662 "EHLO smtp2.Stanford.EDU") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751099AbVH3B7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:59:08 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc7-rt4, fails to build From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano To: Lee Revell Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1125366322.4598.101.camel@mindpipe> References: <1125277360.2678.159.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> <20050829083541.GA21756@elte.hu> <1125364522.7630.108.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> <1125366322.4598.101.camel@mindpipe> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1125367133.7631.133.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 29 Aug 2005 18:58:53 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:45, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:15 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > > > > > I'm getting a build error for 2.6.13-rc7-rt4 with PREEMPT_DESKTOP for > > > > i386: > > > > > > hm, cannot reproduce this build problem on my current tree - could you > > > try 2.6.13-rt1? (and please send the 2.6.13-rt1 .config if it still > > > occurs) > > > > I still get the error, it is happening in the _smp_ build, I don't know > > what's wrong... > > > > arch/i386/mach-generic/built-in.o(.text+0x1183): In function > > `es7000_rename_gsi': > > Well you could certainly work around it by using CONFIG_X86_PC rather > than CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH unless you really needs to support the IBM > x440, Unisys ES7000, or something with more than 8 CPUs... I don't :-) Thanks a lot for the tip!, I'll try the workaround...... -- Fernando