The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>
To: walking.to.remember@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what will connect the fork() with its following code ? a simple example below:
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:37:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126003076.31664.5.camel@tara.firmix.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b5347dc0509060215128d477e@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 17:15 +0800, Sat. wrote:
> if(!(pid=fork())){
>      ......
>      printk("in child process");
>      ......
> }else{
>      .....
>      printk("in father process"); 
>      .....
> }
> 
> this is a classical example, when the fork() system call runs, it will
> build a new process and active it . while the schedule() select the
> new process it will run. this is rather normal.
> 
> but there is always a confusion in my minds. 
> because , sys_fork() only copies father process and configure some new
> values., and do nothing . so the bridge  between the new process and
> its following code, printk("in child process"), seems disappear . so I

No, it is the same point as in the parent process - just the fork()
call. In fact the fork() returns twice - once within the parent process
(returning as result the pid of the child) and once within the child
(returning 0) [ and we ignore the error case for simplicity ].
Basically you are not forced to do a if() or switch() on the return
value(s) of fork()
----  snip  ----
printf("1. fork() in process %d returned %d\n", getpid(), fork());
printf("2. fork() in process %d returned %d\n", getpid(), fork());
printf("3. fork() in process %d returned %d\n", getpid(), fork());
printf("4. fork() in process %d returned %d\n", getpid(), fork());
printf("5. fork() in process %d returned %d\n", getpid(), fork());
----  snip  ----
Put this in a main() function and try it out.

> always believe that the new process should have a pointer which point
> the code "printk("in child process");". except this , there are not
> any connection between them ?

The kernel doesn't know (or care) about the C code (e.g. if(), ...) in
your application.
The "pointer" (if you want to call it) is the normal instruction pointer
(or what else it is called on your CPU).

> very confused :( 

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services


  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-06 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-06  9:15 what will connect the fork() with its following code ? a simple example below: Sat.
2005-09-06 10:37 ` Bernd Petrovitsch [this message]
     [not found] ` <003a01c5b2d6$610d6360$6464a8c0@pc0001>
2005-09-06 11:59   ` Sat.
2005-09-06 12:41     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-09-06 13:01     ` Dirk Gerdes
2005-09-06 16:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-07  7:08   ` Bernd Petrovitsch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1126003076.31664.5.camel@tara.firmix.at \
    --to=bernd@firmix.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=walking.to.remember@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox