From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:01:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126512061.14207.36.camel@lycan.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050911110214.GA16408@thunk.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 856 bytes --]
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 07:02 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:20:06AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> > >I'll bite - what distros are shipping a kernel 2.6.10 or later and still
> > >using devfs?
> > >
> > I'll admit I don't keep track of the distros and what kernels and features
> > they are useing. I think I've heard people mention gentoo, but I
> > haven't verified this.
>
Why do people always remember us as using devfs, instead of being one of
the first distro's supporting it (if not the first) ? :( I already
added support for udev to the initscripts back in Sep 2003, and added
the udev-0.2 package to the tree in Oct 2003.
> Nope, not Gentoo --- Greg KH fixed gentoo a while ago. :-)
>
Not entirely true, but he did start to maintain the udev package around
udev-022.
--
Martin Schlemmer
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-12 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-09 21:45 [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13 Greg KH
2005-09-10 8:27 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-10 21:52 ` Greg KH
2005-09-10 23:03 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-11 5:09 ` Greg KH
2005-09-12 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-09-14 20:00 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-14 20:28 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 23:06 ` Greg KH
2005-09-15 2:10 ` Ioan Ionita
2005-09-10 9:03 ` [GIT PATCH] " Michael Thonke
2005-09-10 12:32 ` Douglas McNaught
2005-09-10 21:55 ` Greg KH
2005-09-10 14:15 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:24 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-09-11 0:48 ` David Lang
2005-09-11 3:07 ` Greg KH
2005-09-11 6:08 ` David Lang
2005-09-11 7:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-09-11 7:13 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-11 7:20 ` David Lang
2005-09-11 11:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-09-12 8:01 ` Martin Schlemmer [this message]
2005-09-11 17:15 ` Greg KH
2005-09-11 11:35 ` Bastian Blank
2005-09-11 11:42 ` CaT
2005-09-11 17:17 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-11 11:44 linux
2005-09-11 15:43 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 20:01 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-14 20:13 ` Kyle Moffett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126512061.14207.36.camel@lycan.lan \
--to=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox