From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
dtor_core@ameritech.net, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, caphrim007@gmail.com,
david-b@pacbell.net, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Lost keyboard on Inspiron 8200 at 2.6.13
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:54:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126914891.17038.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050916152432.5a05aeca.zaitcev@redhat.com>
On Gwe, 2005-09-16 at 15:24 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> I see why you would want to merge them, but is it worth the trouble?
> They are not identical. For one thing, early handoff installs its own
> fake interrupt handlers (Alan Cox insisted on it in the RHEL
> implementation).
You need them because an IRQ could be pending on the channel at the
point you switch over or triggered on the switch and a few people saw
this behaviour.
I'd like to see it shared but that means handoff belongs in the input
layer code and the USB layer needs to call into it if appropriate.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-16 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-16 4:29 Lost keyboard on Inspiron 8200 at 2.6.13 Tim Rupp
2005-09-16 4:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-09-16 5:13 ` Tim Rupp
2005-09-16 9:53 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-16 15:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-09-16 16:00 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-16 18:44 ` Greg KH
2005-09-16 19:00 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2005-09-16 19:45 ` David Brownell
2005-09-16 22:24 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Pete Zaitcev
2005-09-16 22:32 ` Greg KH
2005-09-16 23:54 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2005-09-17 4:12 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-17 8:08 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126914891.17038.30.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=caphrim007@gmail.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox