From: Parag Warudkar <kernel-stuff@comcast.net>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm2
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:17:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126930657.7927.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509162038_MC3-1-AA6D-60D9@compuserve.com>
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 20:36 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> It looks to me like that patch corrupts ebp.
>
> This one works for me, though ebp still appears wrong to a 32-bit
> debugger on syscall exit trace. Maybe that doesn't matter so much.
Did you compile the program under a x86_64 kernel, distro? I ask because
it doesn't compile for me. On my machine asm-i386/user.h and
asm-x86_64/user.h both do not contain a user_regs_struct definition with
x86 registers.
Another thing I noticed was that with the patch %eax was zero for the
failing program although I didn't see how the patch affects %eax.
Parag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-17 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-17 0:36 2.6.13-mm2 Chuck Ebbert
2005-09-17 4:17 ` Parag Warudkar [this message]
2005-09-17 4:30 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Parag Warudkar
[not found] <4KtRD-7Nt-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-09-08 23:23 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Ronny V. Vindenes
2005-09-08 23:34 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 0:26 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Parag Warudkar
2005-09-09 0:55 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Roland McGrath
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-08 12:30 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 13:12 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Benoit Boissinot
2005-09-08 13:48 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-08 14:30 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-09 0:39 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 10:41 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 10:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-08 17:20 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-08 19:39 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 7:02 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-09 1:47 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-09 9:43 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 13:45 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-10 6:33 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Marko Kohtala
2005-09-10 11:45 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 12:42 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 13:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 20:21 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 21:26 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 18:43 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dominik Karall
2005-09-10 22:12 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 23:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:56 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 0:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 0:49 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 0:58 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 1:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 1:22 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 1:25 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 17:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 19:36 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 20:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-12 19:19 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 20:08 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-12 10:04 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:06 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:09 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-18 21:49 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-19 3:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-19 15:56 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-23 16:52 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 20:05 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-29 15:22 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Linus Torvalds
2005-09-12 3:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 5:01 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 6:09 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 7:16 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:06 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 18:19 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dave Hansen
2005-09-12 18:51 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 22:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-13 0:08 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-13 4:00 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 3:10 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126930657.7927.5.camel@localhost \
--to=kernel-stuff@comcast.net \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox