From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964905AbVITHqJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:46:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964907AbVITHqI (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:46:08 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:40646 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964905AbVITHqH (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:46:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/10] vfs: global namespace semaphore From: Ram Pai To: Al Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Miklos Szeredi , mike@waychison.com, bfields@fieldses.org, serue@us.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20050920065142.GH7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20050916182619.GA28474@RAM> <20050920065142.GH7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Message-Id: <1127202362.10061.16.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:46:02 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 23:51, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:26:19AM -0700, Ram wrote: > > This patch removes the per-namespace semaphore in favor of a global > > semaphore. This can have an effect on namespace scalability. > > ... and #2 uses that semaphore... Patch #2, uses the global semaphore. Yes that patch would'nt have compiled without patch #4, because the global semaphore got defined only in the patch #4. RP