From: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>, Ray Lee <ray@madrabbit.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Love <rml@novell.com>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch] stop inotify from sending random DELETE_SELF event under load
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:53:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1127256814.749.5.camel@vertex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509201234560.2553@g5.osdl.org>
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 12:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > > I really think that the patch I sent out yesterday is as good as it gets.
> > > If you want immediate notification, you should ask for notification about
> > > name changes in a particular directory. IN_DELETE_SELF notification on a
> > > file simple is _not_ going to be immediate.
> >
> > But then it's too early. Note that with your patch we still get removal
> > of _any_ link to our inode (even though it's alive and well and we'd never
> > heard about the sodding link in the first place) terminating all events
> > on it.
>
> Yes. What is in the current 2.6.14-rc2 tree doesn't do that. It considers
> inodes "global". But it won't work reliably on networked filesystems, I
> think.
>
> Anyway, I do believe that IN_DELETE_SELF is stupid, but that you migth
> re-arm it if you get it.
Is there some reason we can't just do this from vfs_unlink
inode = dentry->inode;
iget (inode);
d_delete (dentry);
fsnotify_inoderemove (inode);
iput (inode);
This would allow us to have immediate event notification, and avoid a
race with the inode going away, right?
I think the path below will make link handling as good as it can get, by
sending IN_DELETE_SELF every time inode->i_nlink goes down, and when
inode->i_nlink == 0, send the IN_IGNORE event. Also, it stuffs
inode->i_nlink into the cookie giving user space a clue about the status
of the inode.
Index: linux/include/linux/fsnotify.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/fsnotify.h 2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/include/linux/fsnotify.h 2005-09-20 18:46:15.000000000 -0400
@@ -63,8 +63,9 @@
*/
static inline void fsnotify_inoderemove(struct inode *inode)
{
- inotify_inode_queue_event(inode, IN_DELETE_SELF, 0, NULL);
- inotify_inode_is_dead(inode);
+ inotify_inode_queue_event(inode, IN_DELETE_SELF, inode->i_nlink, NULL);
+ if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
+ inotify_inode_is_dead(inode);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-20 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-20 0:48 [patch] stop inotify from sending random DELETE_SELF event under load John McCutchan
2005-09-20 1:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 2:00 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 2:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 3:46 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 4:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 4:24 ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 4:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 4:36 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 4:46 ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 4:53 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 4:58 ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 5:06 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 5:17 ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 12:34 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 16:38 ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 17:44 ` Ray Lee
2005-09-20 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 18:22 ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 22:53 ` John McCutchan [this message]
2005-09-21 0:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-21 0:52 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-21 1:01 ` Al Viro
2005-09-21 1:41 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-21 2:36 ` Al Viro
2005-09-21 8:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-21 9:15 ` Joel Becker
2005-09-21 9:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-21 14:45 ` Joel Becker
2005-09-21 18:08 ` Mark Fasheh
2005-09-20 18:26 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 4:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 4:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 4:27 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 3:33 ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 3:50 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 3:31 ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 3:51 ` John McCutchan
2005-09-20 8:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1127256814.749.5.camel@vertex \
--to=ttb@tentacle.dhs.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray@madrabbit.org \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox