From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] release_resource() check for NULL resource
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:57:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1128351459.7584.3.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051003134241.GV7992@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:43:50PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Many drivers have the release function copy-pasted to init with lots
> > of goto labels exactly because release_region, iounmap, and friends
> > aren't NULL safe.
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:42 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Bullshit. I have waded through many, *many* initialization sequences
> like that. "Lots of goto labels" is _less_ prone to breakage when
> properly done; your variant begs for trouble upon the driver changes.
>
> Note that "lots of goto" is actually a cleaner control structure than
> what you propose - the amount of instances of offending statement is
> far from being the only metrics. The only things to verify with it are
Fair enough. Bad example from my part.
My main argument still remains. It is useful to handle NULL in some
release functions (iounmap and release_resource come to mind) because it
simplifies releasing a partially initialized state. Grep for NULL checks
around iounmap() and release_resource() calls for existing usage in the
drivers...
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-03 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-02 17:03 [PATCH] release_resource() check for NULL resource Ben Dooks
2005-10-02 17:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-10-03 9:48 ` Ben Dooks
2005-10-03 9:59 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-10-03 10:04 ` Russell King
2005-10-03 12:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-10-03 12:49 ` Russell King
2005-10-03 12:54 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-10-03 13:00 ` Russell King
2005-10-03 13:12 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-10-03 13:42 ` Russell King
2005-10-03 13:42 ` Al Viro
2005-10-03 14:57 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2005-10-04 2:15 ` Randy.Dunlap
[not found] ` <5dc44ec70510031959w1f4adfcbh395535ade34a357d@mail.gmail.com>
2005-10-04 3:00 ` Diego de Estrada
2005-10-04 3:28 ` Randy.Dunlap
[not found] <4TfvY-8ix-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4Tg8u-Bn-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4Tv7u-5Hd-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4TvB0-6wD-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4TvB7-6wD-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4TxWv-1xD-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-04 22:31 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-05 9:06 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1128351459.7584.3.camel@localhost \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox