From: gfiala@s.netic.de
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: large files unnecessary trashing filesystem cache?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:10:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1129720232.435629a8753d3@webmail.LF.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051018213721.236b2107.akpm@osdl.org>
Zitat von Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>:
> An obvious approach would be an LD_PRELOAD thingy which modifies read() and
> write(), perhaps controlled via an environment variable. AFAIK nobody has
> even attempted this.
Sounds interesting.
> A decent kernel implementation would be to add a max_resident_pages to
> struct file_struct and to use that to perform drop-behind within read() and
> write(). That's a bit of arithmetic and a call to
> invalidate_mapping_pages(). The userspace interface to that could be a
> linux-specific extension to posix_fadvise() or to fcntl().
Would still like to have a way to configure a "default file policy/heuristics"
for the system, just like i can choose IO-scheduler.
>
> But that still requires that all the applications be modified.
>
> So I'd also suggest a new resource limit which, if set, is copied into the
> applications's file_structs on open(). So you then write a little wrapper
> app which does setrlimit()+exec():
>
> limit-cache-usage -s 1000 my-fave-backup-program <args>
>
> Which will cause every file which my-fave-backup-program reads or writes to
> be limited to a maximum pagecache residency of 1000 kbytes.
Or make it another 'ulimit' parameter...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-19 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-18 20:01 large files unnecessary trashing filesystem cache? Guido Fiala
2005-10-18 20:48 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-20 15:23 ` Guido Fiala
2005-10-19 3:02 ` Andrew James Wade
2005-10-19 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 5:45 ` Andrew James Wade
2005-10-19 11:01 ` gfiala
2005-10-19 11:10 ` gfiala [this message]
2005-10-19 15:54 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-19 19:49 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 22:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-20 6:28 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-19 4:10 ` Lee Revell
2005-10-19 15:43 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-19 17:58 ` Guido Fiala
2005-10-19 18:43 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-10-19 18:52 ` Guido Fiala
[not found] <4Z5WG-1iM-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4Z6zs-27l-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-18 21:58 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-18 23:05 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-19 0:20 ` David Lang
2005-10-19 0:33 ` Fawad Lateef
2005-10-19 1:42 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-10-19 7:23 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-19 11:06 ` gfiala
2005-10-19 13:43 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1129720232.435629a8753d3@webmail.LF.net \
--to=gfiala@s.netic.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox