public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gfiala@s.netic.de
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: large files unnecessary trashing filesystem cache?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:10:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1129720232.435629a8753d3@webmail.LF.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051018213721.236b2107.akpm@osdl.org>

Zitat von Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>:

> An obvious approach would be an LD_PRELOAD thingy which modifies read() and
> write(), perhaps controlled via an environment variable.  AFAIK nobody has
> even attempted this.

Sounds interesting.

> A decent kernel implementation would be to add a max_resident_pages to
> struct file_struct and to use that to perform drop-behind within read() and
> write().  That's a bit of arithmetic and a call to
> invalidate_mapping_pages().  The userspace interface to that could be a
> linux-specific extension to posix_fadvise() or to fcntl().

Would still like to have a way to configure a "default file policy/heuristics"
for the system, just like i can choose IO-scheduler.

> 
> But that still requires that all the applications be modified.
> 
> So I'd also suggest a new resource limit which, if set, is copied into the
> applications's file_structs on open().  So you then write a little wrapper
> app which does setrlimit()+exec():
> 
> 	limit-cache-usage -s 1000 my-fave-backup-program <args>
> 
> Which will cause every file which my-fave-backup-program reads or writes to
> be limited to a maximum pagecache residency of 1000 kbytes.

Or make it another 'ulimit' parameter...


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-19 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-18 20:01 large files unnecessary trashing filesystem cache? Guido Fiala
2005-10-18 20:48 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-20 15:23   ` Guido Fiala
2005-10-19  3:02 ` Andrew James Wade
2005-10-19  4:37   ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19  5:45     ` Andrew James Wade
2005-10-19 11:01       ` gfiala
2005-10-19 11:10     ` gfiala [this message]
2005-10-19 15:54       ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-19 19:49         ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 22:26           ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-20  6:28           ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-19  4:10 ` Lee Revell
2005-10-19 15:43   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-19 17:58   ` Guido Fiala
2005-10-19 18:43     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-10-19 18:52       ` Guido Fiala
     [not found] <4Z5WG-1iM-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <4Z6zs-27l-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-18 21:58   ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-18 23:05     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-19  0:20       ` David Lang
2005-10-19  0:33       ` Fawad Lateef
2005-10-19  1:42         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-10-19  7:23       ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-19 11:06         ` gfiala
2005-10-19 13:43     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1129720232.435629a8753d3@webmail.LF.net \
    --to=gfiala@s.netic.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox