public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Guido Fiala <gfiala@s.netic.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	andrew@osdl.org
Subject: Re: large files unnecessary trashing filesystem cache?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:43:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1129736581.23632.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1129695001.8910.57.camel@mindpipe>

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:10 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 22:01 +0200, Guido Fiala wrote:
> > Of course one could always implement f_advise-calls in all
> > applications
> 
> Um, this seems like the obvious answer.  The application doing the read
> KNOWS it's a streaming read, while the best the kernel can do is guess.
> 
> You don't really make much of a case that fadvise can't do the job.

The issue is, how will "other/random" programs/applications affect 
performance of my application.

Complain I hear most is from our database folks, they tune stuff
and they are happy with their performance. And then, some one does 
a tar/cp/cpio/ftp/backup/compile on some random files on the system.
Suddenly, database performance drops. They want to see a system wide/
per-filesystem tunable on how much pagecache it takes up.

Andrew, does this make sense at all ?


Thanks,
Badari


  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-19 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-18 20:01 large files unnecessary trashing filesystem cache? Guido Fiala
2005-10-18 20:48 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-20 15:23   ` Guido Fiala
2005-10-19  3:02 ` Andrew James Wade
2005-10-19  4:37   ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19  5:45     ` Andrew James Wade
2005-10-19 11:01       ` gfiala
2005-10-19 11:10     ` gfiala
2005-10-19 15:54       ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-19 19:49         ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 22:26           ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-20  6:28           ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-19  4:10 ` Lee Revell
2005-10-19 15:43   ` Badari Pulavarty [this message]
2005-10-19 17:58   ` Guido Fiala
2005-10-19 18:43     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-10-19 18:52       ` Guido Fiala
     [not found] <4Z5WG-1iM-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <4Z6zs-27l-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-18 21:58   ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-18 23:05     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-19  0:20       ` David Lang
2005-10-19  0:33       ` Fawad Lateef
2005-10-19  1:42         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-10-19  7:23       ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-19 11:06         ` gfiala
2005-10-19 13:43     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1129736581.23632.109.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=pbadari@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@osdl.org \
    --cc=gfiala@s.netic.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox