public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>, Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>,
	Roderich.Schupp.extern@mch.siemens.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Race between "mount" uevent and /proc/mounts?
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:45:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1130337932.3340.1.camel@capoeira> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051026143417.GA18949@vrfy.org>

On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 16:34, Kay Sievers wrote:

> They are actually events for claim/release of a block device. As uevents
> are bound to kobjects we needed to send these events from an existing device
> which is the blockdev itself.
> 
> Sure, the event itself, has nothing to do with a filesystem. The names are
> like this for historical reasons and "CLAIM/RELEASE" may be less confusing.
> The events are used as a trigger to rescan /proc/mounts instead of polling
> it constantly.
> 
> If you have a better idea where to plug it, or if we better rename it, we
> should do that...

Make /proc/mount send an inotify event ?



  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-26 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-25 13:20 Race between "mount" uevent and /proc/mounts? Schupp Roderich (extern) BenQ MD PD SWP 2 CM MCH
2005-10-25 14:00 ` Al Viro
2005-10-26 10:27   ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-10-26 11:15     ` Al Viro
2005-10-26 14:34       ` Kay Sievers
2005-10-26 14:45         ` Xavier Bestel [this message]
2005-10-26 19:28         ` Al Viro
2005-11-01  0:28           ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-01  3:58             ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-01 19:54               ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-11-01 21:35                 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 13:01                   ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-11-03  8:07                     ` Al Viro
2005-11-03 10:52                       ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-11-03 11:30                         ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1130337932.3340.1.camel@capoeira \
    --to=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
    --cc=Roderich.Schupp.extern@mch.siemens.de \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox