From: Alexander Shaposhnikov <shaposh@isp.nsc.ru>
To: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq driver + wrong cpu time
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:44:20 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1130737460.3422.17.camel@m00> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4365394B.4000907@tremplin-utc.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2053 bytes --]
Hello Eric,
Its my first foray into kernel driver programming,
so please don't be too hard on me:)
The total elapsed time (by "time foo") is OK.
The problem is, cputime reported by, for example, "top"
utility, is wrong. The same problem with fortran intrinsic routine
"ETIME", so quantum chemistry codes i use (all written in fortran)
reports wrong cputime, but correct "wall(elapsed) time".
I've attached the code. I was able to test it only on my own dual
Opteron system, so have no idea about other MB.
P.S.
Please include me in CC explicitly!
Best Regards,
Alexander Shaposhnikov
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 06:21 +0900, Eric Piel wrote:
> Alexander Shaposhnikov wrote:
> > Hello to everyone.
> >
> Hello Alexander,
>
> > I have written cpufreq_nForce4 kernel driver for cpufreq subsystem.
> > It allows for CPU frequency changing by adjusting FSB speed, for nForce4
> > based motherboards.
> > Works for single-cpu systems, as well as for SMP.
> > The problem is, after changing CPU(s) speed on SMP systems, programs
> > report wrong cpu time (wall time is OK).
> What do you mean by CPU time? Do you mean the output of "time foo" ? How
> do you know the *right* CPU time? Could you provide some examples :-)
>
> Well, anyway, by _rough_ guess, if on UP it works and on SMP it doesn't,
> we could imagine that the difference comes from the fact the tick
> interrupt source is not the same on those systems. You could try to boot
> a UP kernel with local APIC (selectable in the .config) on the
> multi-processor computer to check. Then it might mean that after
> changing the FSB speed, the interrupt source has to be re-programmed...
>
> > What would be the best way to fix this, and shouldn't this be done by
> > the cpufreq subsystem, rather than by hardware driver?
> >
> Probably the best place to discuss about cpufreq is the dedicated
> mailing list : cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk . If you don't mind, you could
> continue there.
>
> Also please, provide the sources of your driver to have a look :-)
>
> cu,
> Eric
[-- Attachment #2: cpufreq_nForce4.tar.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip-compressed-tar, Size: 6946 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-31 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-30 13:11 cpufreq driver + wrong cpu time Alexander Shaposhnikov
2005-10-30 21:21 ` Eric Piel
2005-10-31 5:44 ` Alexander Shaposhnikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1130737460.3422.17.camel@m00 \
--to=shaposh@isp.nsc.ru \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox