From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932478AbVKLTij (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:38:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932477AbVKLTij (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:38:39 -0500 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:19933 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932478AbVKLTii (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:38:38 -0500 Subject: Re: Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel From: Lee Revell To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Neo Jia , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <9a8748490511120634h64a74359s59e4eab3ca8fdda2@mail.gmail.com> References: <43756131.5020702@cse.unl.edu> <9a8748490511120634h64a74359s59e4eab3ca8fdda2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:09:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1131822591.15223.5.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:34 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > You are adding the -rt patchset, the changes in there could also > account for some of the difference although I must admit I don't know > exactely what changes the -rt patchset makes - I've never really > looked at it. Actually he's talking about RTLinux, which is a commercial product. He needs to contact his support rep. Or depending on the nature of his RT constraints, consider the -rt kernel. Lee