From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Dumitru Ciobarcianu <Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@iNES.RO>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:00:45 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132120845.25230.13.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051116061459.GA31181@kroah.com>
Hi.
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 17:14, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:35:30AM +0200, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
> > ??n data de Mi, 16-11-2005 la 00:32 +0100, Pavel Machek a scris:
> > > ...but how do you provide nice, graphical progress bar for swsusp
> > > without this? People want that, and "esc to abort", compression,
> > > encryption. Too much to be done in kernel space, IMNSHO.
> >
> > Pavel, you really should _listen_ when someone else is talking about the
> > same things in different implementations. suspend2 has this feature
> > (nice graphical progress bars in userspace) for a long time now and it's
> > compatible with the fedora kernels.
>
> It's also implemented in the kernel, which is exactly the wrong place
> for this. Pavel is doing this properly, why do you doubt him?
You yourself called it a hack not long ago. I'm not sure why you think
the userspace is the right place for suspending. It seems to me that the
very fact that it requires access to structures that are normally only
visible to the kernel is pretty telling. To be fair, it is true at the
same time that graphical interfaces don't belong in the kernel - but the
vast majority of it - calculating what to write and doing the writing
does. It's only by hamstringing himself and the user - limiting the
image to half of memory that Pavel (and dropping support for writing to
swap) that Pavel can make this work.
> > Why don't you and Nigel (of suspend2) can just work together on this ?
> > It's a shame that much work is wasted in duplicated effort.
>
> It's not duplicated, Nigel knows what need to be done to work together,
> if he so desires.
I know that Pavel and I have such different ideas about what should be
done that it's not worth the effort.
Regards,
Nigel
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> linux-pm mailing list
> linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-15 21:29 [RFC] userland swsusp Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 21:32 ` [linux-pm] " Greg KH
2005-11-15 22:03 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 22:25 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-15 23:32 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 23:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-16 8:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16 4:35 ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2005-11-16 6:14 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 6:00 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2005-11-16 16:50 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 19:57 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-23 10:16 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-11-23 12:02 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-19 9:32 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-19 23:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 19:36 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-18 21:18 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-18 21:20 ` Greg KH
2005-11-19 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-20 21:48 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-20 22:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-21 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-21 14:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 21:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 22:07 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-19 4:18 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-11-19 8:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 23:34 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 16:10 Gross, Mark
2005-11-16 16:44 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 20:20 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:05 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 17:02 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 19:57 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:12 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:20 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:37 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:59 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:54 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:01 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 21:06 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:14 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:18 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:45 ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-17 21:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-11-17 21:16 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:47 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-16 22:10 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 21:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-17 7:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-16 19:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 16:54 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 16:44 ` Greg KH
2005-11-17 17:03 ` Patrick Mochel
2005-11-17 17:31 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:15 ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-17 21:56 ` Greg KH
2005-11-18 17:41 ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-18 23:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 18:50 Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1132120845.25230.13.camel@localhost \
--to=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@iNES.RO \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox