public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Dave Jones <DaveJ@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:20:45 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132172445.25230.73.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051116164429.GA5630@kroah.com>

Hi.

On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 03:44, Greg KH wrote:
> Please, everyone realize that Nigel's code is not going to be merged
> into mainline as it is today.  He knows it, and everyone else involved
> knows it.  Nigel also knows the proper procedure for getting his changes
> into mainline, if he so desires, as we all sat in a room last July and
> discussed this (lwn.net has a summary somewhere about it too...)

Do you mean "as it was in July"? I haven't been sitting on my hands
since July :)  My wife will testify to that!

I've been working on implementing the last new features I want in,
fixing bugs and generally making it as stable and reliable as I can.
(Sorry Andrew, but I'm being a perfectionist). At the same time, many of
the parts that made Suspend2 be considered huge and ugly have been
merged. The pm_message_t stuff, for example, was adopted early by
Suspend2 and part of those stats you saw in July. The patch currently
still includes the workqueue nofreeze patch, Christoph's todo list
freezer modifications. These account for virtually all of the changes
outside of kernel/power.

I've also split the one patch that most people see into what is
currently about 225 smaller patches, each adding only one small part, am
writing descriptions for them all and am preparing to build a git tree
from it.

Hopefully that shows that I am working toward merging, just maybe not in
the way that you were imagining. You'll remember that I've argued before
that trying to patch swsusp into Suspend2 is infeasible. I'm not even
trying to do it.

Regards,

Nigel

> So, here's Pavel trying to make things better and people are complaining
> about it.  Argue that the technical points are invalid (like Dave did.)
> But don't just sit around and kvetch, that doesn't help out anyone.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- 



  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-16 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-16 16:10 [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp Gross, Mark
2005-11-16 16:44 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 20:20   ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2005-11-16 22:05     ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:41         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16 22:50         ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 17:02       ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 19:57         ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:12           ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:20             ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:37               ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:46                 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:59                   ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:54                 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:01                   ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 21:06                   ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:14                     ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:18                       ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:45                         ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-17 21:09                 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-11-17 21:16                   ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:47             ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:50             ` software mixing [was Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp] Lee Revell
2005-11-16 22:10     ` [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp Greg KH
2005-11-16 21:25       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-17  7:14         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-16 19:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 16:54   ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 16:44     ` Greg KH
2005-11-17 17:03       ` Patrick Mochel
2005-11-17 17:31       ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:15       ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-17 21:56         ` Greg KH
2005-11-18 17:41           ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-18 23:22     ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-17 18:50 Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
2005-11-15 21:29 Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 21:32 ` [linux-pm] " Greg KH
2005-11-15 22:03   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 22:25 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-15 23:32   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 23:40     ` Dave Jones
2005-11-16  8:56       ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:41       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16  4:35     ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2005-11-16  6:14       ` Greg KH
2005-11-16  6:00         ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 16:50           ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 19:57             ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 21:35               ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:47                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:53                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-23 10:16                     ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-11-23 12:02                       ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-19  9:32           ` Rob Landley
2005-11-19 23:51             ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 19:36   ` Alan Cox
2005-11-18 21:18     ` Dave Jones
2005-11-18 21:20       ` Greg KH
2005-11-19 23:43       ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-20 21:48         ` Dave Jones
2005-11-20 22:09           ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-21 11:47             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-21 14:19               ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 21:23     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 22:07       ` Alan Cox
2005-11-19  4:18         ` Jesse Barnes
2005-11-19  8:44         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 23:34     ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1132172445.25230.73.camel@localhost \
    --to=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
    --cc=DaveJ@redhat.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox