public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:20:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132611631.11842.83.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17282.15177.804471.298409@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Maw, 2005-11-22 at 08:25 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Ingo Molnar writes:
> 
> > is there any architecture where irq 0 is a legitimate setting that could 
> > occur in drivers, and which would make NO_IRQ define of 0 non-practical?  
> 
> Yes, G5 powermacs have the SATA controller on irq 0.  So if we can't
> use irq 0, I can't get to my hard disk. :)  Other powermacs also use
> irq 0 for various things, as do embedded PPC machines.

G5 powermacs have the SATA controller on physical IRQ value 0. Linux IRQ
values don't need to exactly map. One of the x86 ports handles 'real IRQ
0' exactly this way. Its a cookie. Sure would benefit from a function
for turning an IRQ into a description as a cleanup.

Alan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-21 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-21  1:14 [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 11:12 ` David Howells
2005-11-21 12:14   ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 18:55     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:06       ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 19:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:43           ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 19:59             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:15               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-21 21:25                 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-11-21 21:35                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-21 21:51                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:09                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:34                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 23:00                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 21:49                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:06                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:28                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:58                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 23:20                     ` Paul Mackerras
2005-11-22  1:26                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22  2:45                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 21:50                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:20                   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2005-11-22 11:13                     ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 14:15                       ` Alan Cox
2005-11-22 14:04                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-22 17:03                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 18:20                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-22 18:37                           ` David Howells
2005-11-22 19:03                             ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 19:21                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 23:58                                 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 19:05                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 19:38                               ` David Howells
2005-11-22 19:51                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-23  1:45                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-21 21:16               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 21:38                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:53                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:18                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:20                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1132611631.11842.83.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=spyro@f2s.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox