Re: Christmas list for the kernel

Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-23T16:31:33Z

On 11/23/05, Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:23:37PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:16:37PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > It means that we spun in the serial interrupt for more than 256 times
> > > and reached the limit on the amount of work we were prepared to do.
> > > Any idea what you were doing when these happened?
> >
> > Because ACPI was right and the second serial port isn't there?
>
> Well, it certainly looked like a serial port when it was probed - to the
> extent that even loopback mode worked. Hence I'd be very surprised if
> it wasn't there.
>

It could be on board but not having a connector attached. SInce it is
not useable ACPI might omit it.

--
Dmitry