public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, kr@cybsft.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, pluto@agmk.net, john.cooper@timesys.com,
	bene@linutronix.de, dwalker@mvista.com,
	trini@kernel.crashing.org, george@mvista.com,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:22:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133313771.4627.39.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051130010646.GD19515@wotan.suse.de>

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 02:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > But on my system gettimeofday uses the TSC and it's still ~35x slower
> > than RDTSC:
> > 
> > rlrevell@mindpipe:~$ ./timetest 
> > rdtsc: 10000 calls in 1079 usecs
> > gettimeofday: 10000 calls in 36628 usecs
> 
> First if you run this on an Athlon 64 the measurement is likely
> wrong because RDTSC can be speculated around. To get accurate
> data you need to add synchronizing instructions.
> 

OK.  Just for reference here's what people on the JACK list reported:

2.6.14-rt13, PREEMPT_RT, Athlon X2 4400+ (dual core)

rdtsc: 10000 calls in 68 usecs
gettimeofday: 10000 calls in 5170 usecs

P4@3.3Ghz/HT (OpenSUSE 10.0 2.6.13-15-smp):

rdtsc: 10000 calls in 253 usecs
gettimeofday: 10000 calls in 26547 usecs

> Then you're likely running 32bit. It doesn't use vsyscall gettimeofday
> yet, which makes it slower. 64bit would.

Yes, I am.  So it sounds like vsyscall gettimeofday for i386 is in the
works?

Lee


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-30  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-29 19:37 [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2] Brown, Len
2005-11-29 19:53 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 20:35   ` Lee Revell
2005-11-29 20:51     ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 23:55       ` Lee Revell
2005-11-30  1:06         ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-30  1:22           ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-11-30  1:58             ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-30  2:19               ` john stultz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-15  9:08 2.6.14-rt13 Ingo Molnar
2005-11-18 18:02 ` 2.6.14-rt13 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-18 21:54   ` 2.6.14-rt13 Lee Revell
2005-11-18 22:05     ` 2.6.14-rt13 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-18 22:07       ` 2.6.14-rt13 Ingo Molnar
2005-11-18 22:41         ` 2.6.14-rt13 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-19  2:39           ` 2.6.14-rt13 Steven Rostedt
2005-11-24 15:07             ` 2.6.14-rt13 Ingo Molnar
2005-11-25 20:56               ` [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching to idle_poll (was: Re: 2.6.14-rt13) Steven Rostedt
2005-11-26 13:05                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-29  2:48                   ` [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2] Steven Rostedt
2005-11-29  3:02                     ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-29  3:42                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-29  4:01                         ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-29  6:44                           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-29  6:55                             ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-29 18:05                             ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 14:19                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-29 14:50                                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 15:42                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-02  1:27                               ` Max Krasnyansky
2005-12-02  1:45                                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-03  2:17                                   ` Max Krasnyansky
2005-11-29  4:22                         ` john stultz
2005-11-29 14:22                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-29 13:08                     ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-18 15:26                       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1133313771.4627.39.camel@mindpipe \
    --to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bene@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=john.cooper@timesys.com \
    --cc=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pluto@agmk.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox