From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:59:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1134158342.18432.1.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512091930440.19998@deepthought.mydomain>
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 19:50 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to build an x66-64 kernel on a 32 bit system (Ubuntu 5.10).
> > I added -m64 to the CFLAGS as per the gcc docs. But the build fails
> > with:
> >
> > $ make ARCH=x86_64
> > [...]
> > CC init/initramfs.o
> > CC init/calibrate.o
> > LD init/built-in.o
> > CHK usr/initramfs_list
> > CC arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o
> > CC arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.o
> > AS arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o
> > arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> > arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:204: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S
>
> Unless ubuntu provides a biarch toolchain (and the fact gcc accepts
> '-m64' means nothing - use 'file' on init/built-in.o), you have to build
> a cross toolchain, (just binutils and gcc), put that on your path, and
> use
>
> make ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-
>
> so that the build will use x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as and friends. You
> should not need to mess with the CFLAGS.
>
$ file init/built-in.o
init/built-in.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
>From man gcc, i386 section:
-m32
-m64
Generate code for a 32-bit or 64-bit environment. The 32-bit
environment sets int, long and pointer to 32
bits and generates code that runs on any i386 system. The
64-bit environment sets int to 32 bits and long
and pointer to 64 bits and generates code for AMD's x86-64
architecture.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-09 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-09 18:50 i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?) Lee Revell
2005-12-09 19:50 ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 19:59 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-12-09 21:30 ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 21:40 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 22:19 ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 19:58 ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 20:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 20:41 ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 20:58 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-09 21:35 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:10 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:19 ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 22:37 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-12-10 0:05 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 0:23 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-12-10 1:28 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 1:50 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 8:56 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-10 5:12 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 7:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-10 7:43 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 19:34 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-11 0:00 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-11 0:26 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-16 23:40 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-23 5:59 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11 16:48 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11 16:54 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-09 22:43 ` Xavier Bestel
2005-12-10 1:31 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 20:34 ` Xavier Bestel
2005-12-10 20:48 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1134158342.18432.1.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox