public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:31:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1134178279.18432.55.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1134168222.5270.1.camel@bip.parateam.prv>

On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 23:43 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le vendredi 09 décembre 2005 à 13:50 -0500, Lee Revell a écrit :
> > I'm trying to build an x66-64 kernel on a 32 bit system (Ubuntu 5.10).
> > I added -m64 to the CFLAGS as per the gcc docs. 
> 
> Under debian 32bits with 64bits kernel, I just add -m64 somewhere in the
> main Makefile to rebuild my modules. Didn't try with a whole kernel
> though.

The bug seems to be that the kernel build system does not grok biarch
toolchains - it really insists on a separate toolchain for i386 and
x86_64 even though the situation can be handled with selective use of
-m64.  If I jsut add -m64 to everything then it fails when it gets to
the ia32 stuff.

Lee


  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-10  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-09 18:50 i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?) Lee Revell
2005-12-09 19:50 ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 19:59   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:30     ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 21:40       ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 22:19         ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 19:58 ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 20:21   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 20:41     ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 20:58       ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:25         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-09 21:35           ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:10       ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:19         ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 22:37 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-12-10  0:05   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10  0:23     ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-12-10  1:28       ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10  1:50       ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10  8:56         ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-10  5:12           ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10  7:19             ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-10  7:43               ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 19:34               ` Lee Revell
2005-12-11  0:00                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-11  0:26                   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-16 23:40                   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-23  5:59                   ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11 16:48                   ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11 16:54                     ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-09 22:43 ` Xavier Bestel
2005-12-10  1:31   ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-12-10 20:34     ` Xavier Bestel
2005-12-10 20:48       ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1134178279.18432.55.camel@mindpipe \
    --to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox