public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rt22
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:29:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1134181771.4002.4.camel@leatherman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1134172105.12624.27.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu>

On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 15:48 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> Hi all, I'm running 2.6.14-rt22 and just noticed something strange. I
> have not installed it in all machines yet, but in some of them (same
> hardware as others that seems to work fine) the TSC was selected as the
> main clock for the kernel. Remember this is one of the Athlon X2
> machines in which the TCS's drift...
> 
> dmesg shows this:
>   PM-Timer running at invalid rate: 2172% of normal - aborting.

Hm. That's odd. Either your PM-Timer isn't running at the right
frequency, or something is going wrong in the calibration. I'm
suspecting its the second. If you add a "return 0;" to the top of
verify_pmtmr_rate() in drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c does the acpi_pm
timer keep proper time?

thanks
-john



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-10  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-09 23:48 2.6.14-rt22 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-12-10  1:21 ` 2.6.14-rt22 (acpi_pm vs tsc vs BIOS) Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-12-10  2:31   ` john stultz
2005-12-10  3:10     ` Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
2005-12-10  2:29 ` john stultz [this message]
2005-12-13 20:15   ` 2.6.14-rt22 john stultz
2005-12-14  3:02     ` 2.6.14-rt22 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1134181771.4002.4.camel@leatherman \
    --to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox