From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:12:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1134191524.18432.82.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73oe3ppbxj.fsf@verdi.suse.de>
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 01:56 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> writes:
> > - disable CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
>
> I just tried it here. Adding -m64 to CFLAGS/AFLAGS on a native
> 64bit biarch toolchain and it compiled without problems. It ends
> up with -m64 -m32 for the 32bit vsyscall files, but that seems
> to DTRT at least in gcc 4.
Nope, passing -m64 -m32 does not seem to DTRT on native 32bit biarch
toolchain:
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=arch/x86_64/ia32
gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/x86_64/ia32/.vsyscall-sysenter.o.d -nostdinc
-isystem /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/include -D__KERNEL__
-Iinclude -D__ASSEMBLY__ -m64 -m32 -c -o
arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.o
arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S
arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S:14: Error: suffix or operands
invalid for `push'
etc
That command succeeds if I run it by hand only passing -m32.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-10 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-09 18:50 i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?) Lee Revell
2005-12-09 19:50 ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 19:59 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:30 ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 21:40 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 22:19 ` Ken Moffat
2005-12-09 19:58 ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 20:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 20:41 ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 20:58 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-09 21:35 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:10 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 21:19 ` Kyle McMartin
2005-12-09 22:37 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-12-10 0:05 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 0:23 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-12-10 1:28 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 1:50 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 8:56 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-10 5:12 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-12-10 7:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-10 7:43 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 19:34 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-11 0:00 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-11 0:26 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-16 23:40 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-23 5:59 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11 16:48 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11 16:54 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-09 22:43 ` Xavier Bestel
2005-12-10 1:31 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 20:34 ` Xavier Bestel
2005-12-10 20:48 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1134191524.18432.82.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox