From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: david singleton <dsingleton@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt1 will not compile (was Re: 2.6.14-rt15: cannot build with !PREEMPT_RT)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:14:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1134425688.17058.5.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1134424143.24145.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 16:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 12:44 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 19:25 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > We are unable to build a similar .config (PREEMPT_DESKTOP with soft and
> > > > hardirq preemption disabled) on x86-64:
> > >
> > > Here is the build output, .config attached.
> >
> > Similar problem with 2.6.15-rc5-rt1:
> >
> > $ make
> > CHK include/linux/version.h
> > UPD include/linux/version.h
> > SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86_64
> > SPLIT include/linux/autoconf.h -> include/config/*
> > CC arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> > In file included from include/asm/semaphore.h:48,
> > from include/linux/sched.h:20,
> > from arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:7:
> > include/linux/rwsem.h:43:66: error: asm/rwsem.h: No such file or
> > directory
> > In file included from include/asm/semaphore.h:48,
> > from include/linux/sched.h:20,
> > from arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:7:
>
> Looks like Ingo has a generic rwsem to work with, but if your arch turns
> on CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM, it will compile lib/rwsem.c which
> won't compile as you've seen.
>
> Try out this patch: I changed the Makefile, instead of going to each
> and every arch and change its Kconfig to do it properly.
The patch had no effect.
In fact x86-64 does not set CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM so this test
in include/linux/rwsem.h causes asm/rwsem.h to be included which does
not exist on x86-64:
36 #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK
37 # include <linux/rwsem-spinlock.h> /* use a generic implementation */
38 # ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
39 # define __RWSEM_INITIALIZER __COMPAT_RWSEM_INITIALIZER
40 # define DECLARE_RWSEM COMPAT_DECLARE_RWSEM
41 # endif
42 #else
43 # include <asm/rwsem.h> /* use an arch-specific implementation */
44 #endif
If I change that code to always include <linux/rwsem-spinlock.h>, I get
the exact same failures I did with 2.6.14-rt22:
$ make
CHK include/linux/version.h
CC arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
GEN include/asm-x86_64/asm-offsets.h
CC init/main.o
In file included from include/linux/proc_fs.h:6,
from init/main.c:17:
include/linux/fs.h: In function 'lock_super':
include/linux/fs.h:867: warning: implicit declaration of function 'down'
include/linux/fs.h: In function 'unlock_super':
include/linux/fs.h:873: warning: implicit declaration of function 'up'
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
CC init/do_mounts.o
In file included from include/linux/tty.h:20,
from init/do_mounts.c:5:
include/linux/fs.h: In function 'lock_super':
include/linux/fs.h:867: warning: implicit declaration of function 'down'
include/linux/fs.h: In function 'unlock_super':
include/linux/fs.h:873: warning: implicit declaration of function 'up'
etc.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-12 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-26 6:52 2.6.14-rt15: cannot build with !PREEMPT_RT Lee Revell
2005-11-26 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-26 19:05 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-26 19:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-11-27 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-27 19:57 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-28 11:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-28 1:27 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-28 11:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-28 14:56 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-28 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-28 17:50 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-28 20:34 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-28 22:40 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-29 2:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-29 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-29 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-29 23:19 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-09 1:05 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-10 0:25 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-12 17:44 ` 2.6.15-rc5-rt1 will not compile (was Re: 2.6.14-rt15: cannot build with !PREEMPT_RT) Lee Revell
2005-12-12 21:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-12 22:14 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-12-12 22:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-12 22:31 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-12 22:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-13 3:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-13 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-16 20:53 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-12 22:39 ` K.R. Foley
2005-12-13 8:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-13 14:32 ` [PATCH -RT] fix i386 RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK (was: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt1 will not compile) Steven Rostedt
2005-12-13 15:03 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1134425688.17058.5.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=dsingleton@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox