From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kihontech.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Gunter Ohrner <G.Ohrner@post.rwth-aachen.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 00/02] SLOB optimizations
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:39:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1135096771.13138.312.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0512201123580.26851@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 11:29 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Tests:
> > > =====
> >
> > could you also post the output of 'size mm/slob.o', with and without
> > these patches, with CONFIG_EMBEDDED and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> > enabled? (and with all debugging options disabled) Both the UP and the
> > SMP overhead would be interesting to see.
> >
> Well, there is definitely a hit there:
There's also crap that can be removed in my patch. Like I started a
cache_chain algorithm. For example by adding just:
#if 0
static void test_slob(slob_t *s)
{
[...]
}
void print_slobs(void)
{
[...]
}
#endif
I get:
rt:
size mm/slob.o
text data bss dec hex filename
1889 112 233 2234 8ba mm/slob.o
rt smp:
size mm/slob.o
text data bss dec hex filename
2135 120 233 2488 9b8 mm/slob.o
So, I probably need to add stuff for CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
-- Steve
>
> rt (slob new):
> size mm/slob.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 2051 112 233 2396 95c mm/slob.o
>
> without
> size mm/slob.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1331 120 8 1459 5b3 mm/slob.o
>
> rt smp (slob new)
> size mm/slob.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 2297 120 233 2650 a5a mm/slob.o
>
> without
> size mm/slob.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1573 140 8 1721 6b9 mm/slob.o
>
>
> So, should this be a third memory managment system? A fast_slob?
>
>
> Just for kicks here's slab.o:
>
> rt:
> size mm/slab.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 8896 556 144 9596 257c mm/slab.o
>
> rt smp:
> size mm/slab.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 9679 640 84 10403 28a3 mm/slab.o
>
> So there's still a great improvement on that (maybe not the bss though).
>
> -- Steve
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Steven Rostedt
Senior Programmer
Kihon Technologies
(607)786-4830
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-20 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-16 11:30 2.6.15-rc5-rt2 slowness Gunter Ohrner
2005-12-16 11:42 ` Gunter Ohrner
2005-12-16 12:04 ` Gunter Ohrner
2005-12-16 12:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-16 12:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-16 22:58 ` john stultz
2005-12-17 0:22 ` Gunter Ohrner
2005-12-17 3:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-17 3:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-17 22:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-18 16:05 ` K.R. Foley
2005-12-20 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-20 13:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 13:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-20 14:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 14:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 15:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-20 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 15:44 ` [PATCH RT 00/02] SLOB optimizations Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 15:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 15:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-20 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-20 16:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 16:39 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-12-20 18:19 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-20 19:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 19:43 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-20 20:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 20:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-12-20 21:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 21:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-20 22:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-21 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 12:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-21 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 7:16 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-12-21 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 13:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-21 15:34 ` [PATCH] SLAB - have index_of bug at compile time Steven Rostedt
2005-12-21 7:20 ` [PATCH RT 00/02] SLOB optimizations Eric Dumazet
2005-12-21 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 8:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-22 18:02 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-12-22 21:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-22 21:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-22 21:44 ` George Anzinger
2005-12-22 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-22 22:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-23 19:22 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-12-21 13:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-21 2:30 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-21 2:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 15:44 ` [PATCH RT 01/02] SLOB - remove bigblock list Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 15:44 ` [PATCH RT 02/02] SLOB - break SLOB up by caches Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 14:07 ` 2.6.15-rc5-rt2 slowness Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 15:26 ` K.R. Foley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1135096771.13138.312.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@kihontech.com \
--cc=G.Ohrner@post.rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox