From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932445AbVL1CRw (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:17:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932446AbVL1CRw (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:17:52 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:51929 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932445AbVL1CRv (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:17:51 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rt22 (and mainline): netstat -anop triggers excessive latencies From: Lee Revell To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: References: <1135145065.29182.10.camel@mindpipe> <1135204629.14810.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1135732888.22744.51.camel@mindpipe> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:22:42 -0500 Message-Id: <1135736563.22744.58.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 21:11 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > So it really does improve the latency here. Now is this worth the > > > overhead? This might be useful in other places to. > > > > Any chance you can regenerate the patch against 2.6.15-rc5-rt4? > > > > Sure, if I can find the damn thing. Too many kernels, and too many patch > directories. Never mind, I applied it by hand. I'll let you know how it works. Lee